March 30, 2004
Machine Generated Emails
I'm growing to detest emails which are generated by machines, more often then not they are unhelpful, wrong, or just plain dumb.
Lets take today's latest email...
Some header fields have been removed and email addresses munged.
From MAILER-DAEMON Tue Mar 30 12:10:25 2004 Return-Path: <> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 06:44:46 -0500 From: EIS Virus Alert To: david@munged.domain.name.example.com Subject: InterScan NT Alert Content-Length: 273 Sender, InterScan has detected virus(es) in your e-mail attachment. Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 06:44:46 -0500 Method: Mail From: <david@dmunged.domain.name.example.com> To: brownd269@munged.american.domain.name.example.com File: message_part2.pif Action: clean failed - deleted Virus: WORM_NETSKY.D
All very well it seems except for two little matters. If a virus scanner is smart enough to detect NetSky, then it should also be smart enough to:
- know that NetSky uses fake email addresses and that it shouldn't bother the person in the From line (i.e. me - who doesn't even run Windows and CAN'T be infected by NetSky) about it.
- follow the email standard for From fields and provide an email address that I complain to.
I don't care when a virus is faking itself as being from me, I don't need to be informed about it as I don't have a message to resend sans-viri. I'd actually like a little less junk in my mailbox, thank-you.
On a similar note, Out Of Office messages can be just as bad.
Posted at March 30, 2004 01:46 PM (TrackBack)
